<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>LucaFiligheddu.com - Latest Comments in TechCrunch, Seesmic and the Conflict of Interests</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media, VoIP, and a lot of Tech News</description><atom:link href="https://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/techcrunch_seesmic_and_the_conflict_of_interests/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:18:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: TechCrunch, Seesmic and the Conflict of Interests</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/02/techcrunch-seesmic-and-the-conflict-of-interests.html#comment-3051651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No, disclosures are great and usually Michael Arrington is quite clear with that. But, if you run a powerful and popular website like that and you invested in a company, is not fair promoting it that way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">luca filigheddu</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch, Seesmic and the Conflict of Interests</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/02/techcrunch-seesmic-and-the-conflict-of-interests.html#comment-3051650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mean even their "disclosures" in posts when they are investors aren't enough?!?  Kidding, the conflicts are ridiculous.  Nonetheless, they didn't keep Edgeio from going to the "deadpool"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:13:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>