<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>LucaFiligheddu.com - Latest Comments in How to find Ooma on Google</title><link>http://lucafiligheddu.disqus.com/</link><description>Social Media, VoIP, and a lot of Tech News</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: How to find Ooma on Google</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/09/how-to-find-ooma-on-google.html#comment-3051283</link><description>Yeah, Google is constantly facing law suits because of this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:11:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to find Ooma on Google</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/09/how-to-find-ooma-on-google.html#comment-3051282</link><description>This is really rather sad. It also says they have more money than sense. Talk about flogging a dead horse!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stuart Henshall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:03:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to find Ooma on Google</title><link>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/09/how-to-find-ooma-on-google.html#comment-3051281</link><description>Yeah.  It's a pretty common practice.  There's irony that if those ads appear on a site of the actual product trademark owner, and someone clicks on the ooma ad, ooma pays the real product maker for that click.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is generally considered a "black hat" (or sinister) practice and will burn bridges, however.  It basically means Ooma has no intention of partnering with any of these companies because the terms of such a deal would generally forbid buying that company's tradmarked keyoords (and often many other related keywords).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Irony Abounds</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:40:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>